Securing the blessing of liberty Essay Example

Securing the blessing of liberty Paper â€Å"Securing the blessings of liberty† was an idea initiated by the framers. To start, the essay will focus on defining and elaborating more concerning the idea. Securing the blessing of liberty was an idea initialized after the American Revolution. The blessings that the framers are talking about, represent the rights that they had acquired after fighting during the American Revolution (Edwards 78).The framers were tired of the tyranny rule and as a result, they fought to oppose the rule of the British. By the term ‘securing’, the framers meant that they wanted these rights not only for themselves, but also for the future generations. The freedoms and rights were protected after the amendment of the constitution. The constitution was amended in such a way that it accommodated the bills of rights, which was a combination of several freedoms and liberties such as, the freedom of religion, among others. The constitution stipulated that the congress did not have sole power to amend or tamper with the bill of rights. The constitution was also amended in such a way that it automatically assumed that people had acquired the rights from the creator, therefore not even the congress had the ability to snatch these rights away from the people. These two amendments ensured total protection of freedoms, rights, and liberties of the people. Ways in which the idea related to the understanding of the framer’s role and the government structure We will write a custom essay sample on Securing the blessing of liberty specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Securing the blessing of liberty specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Securing the blessing of liberty specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer This chapter will focus on ways in which the idea brought about understanding among the framers, concerning their role and the structure of the government. To start, the essay will look at how the idea brought understanding upon the framers concerning their roles. After which, the essay will elaborate on the understanding of the government structure. The idea brought about the concept of equality. That every man (woman inclusive), had equal rights. These rights were equal because they were all created by one God who bestowed these rights upon creation. Therefore, the idea made the framer’s feel that it was their role to fight for the equality of all people. The struggle for equity began during the American Revolution and continued all through until the framers formed the constitution and introduced the republican form of government. The formation of the republican government and the constitution, marked the beginning of equity among the people, regardless of status, rank, and race among many others. The idea revolved around matters concerning rights, freedoms, and liberties of the people. After struggling under the British rule for a long time, the idea made the framers feels that it was their role to safeguard and protect the rights , freedoms, and liberties of the people, from manipulation by the government. The framers took it upon themselves to come up with a constitution and a republican form of government (a government for the people by the people. These two aspects (constitution and the republican structure) ensured that the rights, freedoms, and liberties were protected (Dysart 95). This idea enabled the framers to understand more concerning the structure of the government. The idea was based on equality that manifested itself in form of rights, freedoms, and liberties. The idea also worked towards securing these liberties for the future generations. Having this in mind, the framers understood that the republican and the democratic government structureswere suitable at the moment. The framers understood that by implementing the republic structure, the people would voice their opinions through voting hence, giving them an opportunity to express themselves. The framers also understood that the republican structure would also represent the minority in that, the representatives would also be assigned in accordance to the population of the districts. Therefore, the framers enacted the republican and democratic structures (Christopher 97). American political culture and the basic tenets of American democracy The American political culture contains core ideal and values. These ideals and values include liberty, equality, democracy, individualism, unity, and diversity. The American political culture dwells on these values and ideals and on ways to achieve each of them. The American government relied on these values, and used them to ensure proper governance. After a long period of living under the British rule, the framers felt that there was need for change. This explained the cause of the American Revolution. After achieving independence (acquired through struggle and sacrifice), the framers established a republican and democratic government that contained the key values and ideal cores mentioned above, to prevent the reoccurrence of the dictatorial rule (as it had been under the British governance). The American democracy was made up of certain basic tenets. These tenets include, individual worth, equity, individual freedom, popular sovereignty, majority rule, minority rights, limited government, religious freedom, and compromise. These tenets acted as the foundation of democracy, they (the tenets) helped define democracy and show what it entailed. Democracy helped to preserve the rights, liberties, and freedoms of the people, with the help of these tenets. Through these tenets of democracy, the framers were able to â€Å"secure the blessing† for themselves and for future generations (Bimber 98). References Bimber, Bruce Allen. Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Dysart, Christopher Ward. Securing the Blessings of Liberty. . Louis U. Pub. L. Rev.6 (1987): 341. Edwards Jr, James R. Securing the Blessings of Liberty. Center for Immigration Studies (2011). Sullivan, John L., James Piereson, and George E. Marcus. American democracy. University of Chicago Press, 1993.

Sample Essays For Harvard University - Prepare For The Admission Test

Sample Essays For Harvard University - Prepare For The Admission TestSample essays for Harvard University are available to help you prepare for the admission test. These essays will help you show your abilities in critical reading, writing, and proofreading skills, and will aid you in gaining acceptance for any of the Master's degree programs that you choose.The essays should be written for each specific college or school that you apply to. This will ensure that the essay is written in a way that will fit in best with the requirements of the college. You can then work to write the most appropriate essay for each type of essay that you are applying for.Sample essays for Harvard University are not only written to help you apply to any specific school. They are also used to provide you with an insight into what Harvard University expects. For example, you may want to write about a specific event or trait that you have. Writing about your favorite movie will let you show how you enjoy th e different aspects of different movies.Harvard University uses particular essay styles for each individual application. There are several types of essay styles that are outlined in the essay requirements that you will see when you are getting ready to apply. You should spend time learning these styles. This will help you when it comes time to writing the essay and making sure that it is a good one.Sample essays for Harvard University are available online. These websites will provide you with sample essays, but these do not come with the same amount of attention as a printed form. There are also many resources that will provide you with free samples to use as a guide. You will find that the free online resources do not have as much information as the ones that are usually provided by colleges and universities.You will need to make sure that the essay is clearly laid out, and that all the points are addressed. If there are any points that are left out, the information will not be acc urately shown. This means that you will have to work hard to make sure that all of the information that you want is included. Be sure to use your own unique voice when writing your essay.These essays will help you get the admission test that you need. These samples will help you to have an idea of what each essay requires, and this will help you to choose the essay that will be the best for your needs.

Diante Hardy Hardy 1 Essays (1456 words) - Structure, Economy

Diante Hardy Hardy 1 Essays (1456 words) - Structure, Economy Diante Hardy Hardy 1 Professor Watson CDLP 9 December 2016 My dad once told me that non -profits are based on two concepts. Those concepts are voluntarism and market failure. I didn't quite understand what he meant by that. He then explained to me that Voluntarism is basically applied ethics, and action for the benefit for the public. Market failure basically explains the existence of non-profits. Non-profit organizations are everywhere in Rhode Island. Wherever there are people, there are non-profits organizations. Non-profit or Not-for-profit organizations exist to preform or provide services for the people within the communities. Whether provided by a public organization or agency, or private organization or agency, they serve a purpose for the people. The Government, educational institutions, community organizations, and health care facilities are all examples of non-profit organizations. Some of these examples work within small neighborhoods with only a few employees and others work state-wide. A nonprofit is an organization that does not seek to turn invested money into more money distribution to its owners. The donors have goals that they seek to acco mplish through the organization, but those goals do not include profiting directly from the organizations activities. Governments often encourage donations to nonprofits by making those donations tax-exempt. Nonprofits do not necessarily aim to lose money; some try to break even or even accumulate money through sale of products and investment of funds. Nonprofits receive treatment by being exempted from income taxes. In the United States, donors can in some cases write off their donations to nonprofits as a deduction on their income tax returns. This encourages the use of the nonprofit form of organization. Since a not-for-profit organization is formed to accomplish a specific task, the profits raised by the organization must be given back into the organization so it is able to make sure their mission is completed successfully. This means all the money earned by the not-for-profit organization will be in the organization. However, money raised by the nonprofit organizations can be used to pay employees, and to complete other missions they may have. In the case for a for-profit organization, the money earned for the company may be given to the owners of the company. A nonprofit organization may qualify for state and federal tax. The decision is made by the IRS as to whether an organization can be a 501c3. Designation as a 501c3 may give a nonprofit organization the chance from paying sales and property taxes on real estate owned by the nonprofit organization. A for-profit organization will not be granted a federal or state tax exemption. Furthermore, for-profit organizations are required to pay taxes on property owned by the company. The main source of money for non-profit organizations is charitable donations. This is also helped by grants, contracts for service and sale of goods. Non-profit organizations are often evaluated on the relationship between contributions and expenses. Tis relationship will show the potential contributors the amount of money that will be used to meet the mission of the organization. Unlike for-profits, nonprofits money flows as the result of operations that are put back into the organization to further the group's mission. Nonprofit organizations are vital to all communities. They provide much required services to those in need from the humanitarian, religious, healthcare, social service, educational, or environmental sector. While striving for success, nonprofit organizations are faced with many obstacles. These problems are hiring of qualified staff, unrealistic expectations, and bad facilities, to lack of people volunteering. Unrealistic goals can have a negative impact on the success of a nonprofit organization and also the relationship of the team involved; the funders and grantees. Nonprofit organizations are very impactful on the communities. Nonprofits are a quality of life because of the valuable programs they provide for the local citizens, but also because of the positive economic impact within our local communities . Nonprofit organizations play a vital role in society by focusing resources and providing services to community needs without regard to profit. Nonprofits aid in the development and upkeep of such sectors of society as the arts, economic development, cultural awareness, spirituality, veterans affairs, and health and wellness. In general, nonprofit organizations have strong ties to their local

The Fault in Our Stars - Book Club Discussion

'The Fault in Our Stars' - Book Club Discussion The Fault in Our Stars by John Green has characters who ask big questions. Use this guide to help your book club think about some of the themes Green raises. Spoiler Warning: These book club discussion questions contain important details about the story. Finish the book before reading on. Do you like the first person style of the novel?Even though The Fault in Our Stars deals with timeless questions, it has many markers of the year it was written from facebook pages to text messages and TV show references. Do you think these things will affect its ability to endure over the years or do the concrete references enhance its appeal?Did you guess that Augustus was sick?On page 212, Hazel discusses Maslows Heirarchy of Needs: According to Maslow, I was stuck on the second level of the pyramid, unable to feel secure in my health and therefore unable to reach for love and respect and art and whatever else, which is, of course, utter horseshit: The urge to make art or contemplate philosophy does not go away when you are sick. Those urges just become transfigured by illness. Discuss this statement, and whether you agree with Maslow or Hazel.In support group, Hazel says, There will come a time when all of us are dead. All of us. There will come a time when there are no human be ings remaining to remember that anyone ever existed or that or species ever did anything...maybe that time is coming soon and maybe it is millions of years away, but even if we survive the collapse of our sun, we will not survive forever...And if the inevitability of human oblivion worries you, I encourage you to ignore it. God knows thats what everyone else does (13). Do you worry about oblivion? Do you ignore it? Different characters in the novel have different views and coping mechanisms to deal with life an death. How do you? Reread Augustus letter that Hazel gets via Van Houten at the end of the novel. Do you agree with Augustus? Is is a good way for the novel to end?What affect does the mingling of normal teenage problems (break ups, coming of age) with a terminal diagnosis create in the novel? For instance, do you think it is realistic that Isaac would care more about his break up with Monica than his blindness?Rate The Fault in Our Stars 1 to 5.

Exotica and feminisim Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Exotica and feminisim - Essay Example All the feminist authors and activists are of the view that such type of films showing women mere in supporting roles, as well as exhibiting their body parts as sign of men’s entertainment, are not only humiliating, but also prove the women folk as the lesser creatures or worthless stratum of society, which contain inferior status than men. Before embarking upon the above-described film in details, it would be appropriate to define feminist perspective: Social groups have not only been divided into different classes in respect of socio-economic status and different occupations and professions, but also distribution of the individuals of a society is based on age, ethnicity, race, region, religion and gender too. Social inequalities are found in all fields of life and in all the institutions and organizations existing in a society. In this pretext the Feminist perspective theory came into existence. The idea of division of labor on the basis of gender gave birth to feminism. It was a strong voice against the inequalities between men and women in respect of social status, division of power as well as work and gender discrimination. â€Å"Feminism is†, Macionis submits, â€Å"the advocacy of social equality for women and men, in opposition to patriarchy and sexism. The first wave of feminism in the United States-began in the 1840s as women opposed to slavery drew parallels between the suppression of African Americans and the o ppression of women.† (2007:353) The theory aimed at seeking equal status for women in every field of human life, where no one could treat them as inferior community on the basis of gender discrimination. The theorists who brought the significance of women’s participation in the social construction programs to the limelight were declared as rebels in the beginning, and then liberals and Marxists subsequently. With the passage of

Argument Proposal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Argument Proposal - Essay Example Sometimes discrimination of race and color involves people getting some treatment unfavorably just because he or she had to marry or married to some persons of certain races or color. Sometimes it happens when the person with the raced-based organization is to some extent relating with people of some color. The worse include discrimination that does occur when the person who imposed the discrimination and the victim do have the same race or color. In the book of â€Å"one amazing thing,† Divakaruni demonstrate some racial discrimination she has had to prevail in the matter of marriage. For instance, Malathi in the story unfold the conversation of Ravi and Nirmila. Ravi is the one son of Mrs. Balan, who is a hair stylist of Lola’s parlor, in which case Malathi joins as the beautician. Nirmala, who is a servant maid with whom Ravi exchanges kisses. Unfortunately, his mother gets them red-handed. It is at this point that Ravi threatens his mother. The Threat is that he will flee back to America if she goes ahead to fire Nirmala from her Job. Mrs. Balan had to permit Nirmala to stay. When Mr. Balan had to enquire Ravi secretly whether he wants to have some settlement with Nirmala in a flat for her to visit without disrupting house peace, Ravi had to say that he had none intention to take advantage of her. In addition, there is the demonstration of Naina, in which case she had to insist on her parents that she would marry none apart from Mangalam. Naina’s father had hopes that Mangalam would keep Naina happy. However, Naina becomes some dominating wife and do not respect Mangalam’s parents, and hence, she showed some discrimination (Divakaruni). In my opinion, discrimination in any form of banking, housing, employment, business among others is illegal, and hence, it is against the law. Many societies in the current world do not approve discrimination that bases the gender or race. They consider the words

Liberalism Is The Most Convincing Of Theories Politics Essay

Liberalism Is The Most Convincing Of Theories Politics Essay Other theories of international relation have been created to guide a states relationship with the international society. These include the classical realism, liberalism, the English school and others. Of all the theories of international relations learned in this module, liberalism interests me most. Liberalism as a theory in international relation holds some interesting supports and views which are not only important but very crucial and practical in the modern global economy. It is a political philosophy that emphasizes the power of institutions and individual liberalism seeks a society where there exists a free market economy that simplify private enterprise, exchange of idea is independent, rule of law and a transparent system of government. International relations, liberalism is of specific importance as regards world peace and security, environmental protection, trade and fostering good relation between different states. Liberalism and international relation It is no doubts that the issues of peace, security, welfare, environment and trade are the weightiest matters in international relation. No any other theory addresses these issues as does the liberalism. The basic argument is that, both the state and non state actors are important as far as international relations are concerned (Burchill et al, 2005). The state does not perform alone player in the international scene by enhancing their state capability. Rather, the state has to bias to individual benefit and other non state actors to guide and determine its behavior when dealing with other states or nations on that area. Therefore an individual should not work for the state but the state should be work to complete the wishes and concern of people. The reasoning is that individuals make up the state and the world is one big community of individual. This perception is specially very related with modern globalization and technological advancement which have seen the organization of a gl obal community. Dunne, Kurki and Smith (2007) could be observe that, the heart of assumption in all classical liberal theories is that domestic actors and structures strongly agree on foreign policy direction and the behavior of the state in international relations. Even though all under the powerful umbrella of liberalism, there exist different approaches with small differences in terms of how they view and interpret international relations. Mostly, liberalists could be seen on two dimensions. The first dimension comprises of those liberalists theories proceedings and interaction. It puts attention on the domestic actors and tries to understand, give explanation how their identities and interest to do decide foreign policy options and international relations (Burchill, 2005). The second dimension, on the other hand comprise of theories which bias themselves to structures and agents as the basis to international relations. Liberalists liable to this dimension take their care on institutional feature s within the state to explain international behavior (Dunni, Kurki Smith, 2007). According to two dimensions are further differed based on whether their theoretical assumptions support rationalism or constructivism. Despite the differences, liberalists hold important basic ideals which are particularly good and helpful in international relations. The basic principles of liberalism lay on the individual. The individual here also point to the collectivities of individuals such as institutions, firms and other organizations. The individual and not the states interests should come first. The work of the state is to support the rule of law and see to it that it is enforced. Since individuals are the ones who make up the state, the state cannot be active unilaterally except it is serving the benefit of those that it represents (Linklater, 2000; Richardson, 2001). The state derives power from the citizens and has controlled power to do unilaterally. The state should be governed in manner that respects the rights of its citizens to property, life and above all, individual freedom. Given that individuals expand to beyond the state such as international organizations and firms, are not only inconsistency but also cooperation can shape international affairs. Liberalism believes in the power of human reason and individuals rational principles could be put into perform in international relations. For example, according to Kant extrapolating in 1795 the foundations of liberal thinking; If the consent of the citizens is required to decide that war should be declaredà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ nothing is more natural than they would be very cautious in commencing such a poor game, decreeing for themselves all are the calamities of war. Among the latter would be: having to fight, having to pay the costs of war from their own resources, having painfully to repair the devastation war were leaves behind, and, to fill up the measure of evils, load themselves with a heavy national debt that would embitter peace itself that can never be liquidated on account of constant wars in the future. (Kant 1795)(as cited by Dunni, Kurki Smith, 2007). In a liberalist conduct state, individuals and not the state unilateral carefulness will have to determine on major decisions that affect international relations. The issue such as the war on terrorism which absolutely involves two or more state actors would have to be agreed by the citizens. In so doing, they would have weighed the benefits and costs of supporting such a move and agree to responsibilities and whichever outcomes results. The other point is those liberalists are very cheerful that, when individual are left free to make up their reason can attain mutually beneficial cooperation. Even though individuals, like they are left to reason freely tend to additional their own self interests. Such diverse self interests exist on just a few issues. In many of the issues individuals will have analogous views and interests. It is common interests on the majority of issues that foster mutual social interests and help set up good international relations. Thus of modernization and globalization are seen as the outcome of these reasoning. Since modernization represent progress be it economic or social which in turn develop the human life, so does international relations improve with liberalism. According to Evans Newnham (1998), the relevance and importance of liberalism in international relations could be seen in four areas. That are, the first area respects world peace. World peace cannot be achieved except there is the spread of democratic institutions in globally. By democratic institutions it means, there exist democratic systems in the state that allows people to freely scorn the elected government but no as to disagree with it, its right to be the government (Shapiro, 2003). Therefore exists free spaces through which individuals and other non-state actors can act with decorum, independence and vision. The second importance is belief of liberalism is that mean exist a natural harmony of interests. In this regard, people and sates will have the independence to make their own rational judgments and as a result is building national interest, international interests one and the similar. In basically, this core belief rests on the first one, it about democratic institutions. Where there is the being of democratic institutions, the state will not have the power to proceed unitary without respecting the will of its citizens. The state exists for the people and therefore it would not have any other alternative but to make decisions that majority of the people agree with. Individual actors will however have diverse interest spanning beyond their national boundaries. It is these spanning interests that in the long run create a natural harmony of interests. People will not have to be enforced to agree or harmonize their interests with other states but rather their needs will drive them to it. The third belief is concern the conflict resolution and respect for the rule of law. This belief similarly succeeds the second one of the democratic institutions. Under liberalism, self determination is never a suitable concept. Where conflicts therefore arise, there should be recognized judicial procedures or any other corresponding procedures that should be followed in resolving the differences. Such procedures could be negotiations or international institutions and area such as European Union, the United Nations or the International Criminal Court. Disputes resolved through these means will not only bring justice to the parties involved but will also be seen to reverence the rule of law (Griffith, 1999). The fourth and the last belief is that, collective security replaces the notion of self-help. When the people have vested interests spanning beyond national boundaries, they will grasp upon themselves that war, insecurity and terrorism will no only make affect that one state where insecurity exists, but also the interests that they hold in that state. They are likely union unity to against such ills. In addition, liberalism is about maintenance morality and decisions from supporting of ethical. States should therefore interfere on issues such as those affect on environment because it does not only affect a single state. There are generally four liberalistic concepts that are used to explain how cooperation in international relations can be achieved with liberalism and to make the world much better. These are the social liberalism, interdependence liberalism, republican liberalism and the institutional liberalism. That can be following the detail in below of this. Sociological liberalism According to this section of liberalism, international relations do not only apply to governments but as well as between private individuals groups and a whole of societies. Sociological liberalism views focusing international relations on the state to state actors like very limiting. in its place, international relation situations can be improved and can be made much more better if non state actors also were included to play a role. In generally of the liberalist, individuals are more peace loving than governments and the more they link up and network with each other beyond the states boundaries better for international relations. When the individual actors link up and cooperate beyond their national boundaries they form up transnational relations. According to Jackson Sorenson (2007), the transnationalism is the immediate outcome achieved when international relations advanced by the states is supplemented by relations among individuals, groups and societies. This relationship is stronger and long-lasting than any other kind of relationship because it has important consequences. This is because, if the states get to disagree, there are too many actors who depend and have helped set up that kind of relationship. This kind of relationship is often compared to the cobweb by illustrate the many non-state actors with all different types of external ties and interest with another. Transnational relations help establish a new form of human society which works beside or even in completion with the states. Non state actors have especially been empowered by technology and can be increased social communication (Sullivan , 2002). Due to pressure from these actors the state has no selection but to conform. A good example here would be the political situations of Kenya and Madagascar in Africa. Upon the disputed Kenyan presidential elections that were followed by ethnic aggression in 2008, it was non state actors that pressurized the contenders try to stop or broker the power sharing deal (Lafargue, 2009). In addition the modern world, as individual firms and businesses investment in other countries, they necessitate cooperation particularly if the investments are of public nature such as roads, communication infrastructures, and other public investments. The individual firms are becoming more important than the state itself due to globalization and innovations technological. Interdependence Liberalism As transnational relations increase, so does the level of interdependence to nearly the level of dependence. This both dependences therefore means that, individuals and the state are affected by what happens in other countries. Such as issues of war, terrorism, the pollution of the environment and some even economic policies will affect more than one country or neighbor countries (Daddow, 2009). In a good example here it is the political instability in Somalia and the current global financial crisis. The instability in Somalia has seen an increased security pressure of terrorist and terrorist groups which take advantage of the situation to advance their ills. In addition, there have been increased piracy in the chasm and the east African coast have seen many ships sailing the route be hijacked only to be released after payment for ransoms. The lack a purposeful of government has therefore degenerated from being a Somali problem to a world problem. Many of the ships being hijacked are not even headed to Somalia. For example in other in global crisis, it started in the United States. It has since affected all economies and although people at varying degrees. Such issues show how the level of interdependence has grown. Another philosophical issue there concerns the environment. Green house gases emission in China or the United States do not only affect climate or lead to global warming in the two countries only, but also in whole of the world. Even though some countries such as in Africa may have a little contribution on this, they may on the contrary be the main victims of climate change through hunger, poverty and malnutrition. Resolving such that issues need to requires the cooperation by both state and non state actors in all countries. Republican liberalism Republican liberalism examines liberal democracies as the most important of peaceful type of political system. Since there are only two types of democracies in the world, democratic and non democratic, three types of relationships in international relations are possible. These are: between a democratic and another democratic state between non-democratic and another non ­-democratic state, and between a democratic and another non-democratic state. The best form of international relationship happens to be one between two democracies. This is because more often than not domestic politics will determine the shape and nature of international relationship that state engages in democratic nations are founded on the principles of a domestic culture that promotes peaceful disagreement resolution, general moral values and commonly beneficial ties of economic cooperation and freedom making them difficult to engage in war with each other. Democratic relationship therefore fosters a form of dem ocratic peace because democracies are managed by citizens who are not at any one time shore up the idea of attractive in a war between two democracies. Republican liberalists single out war as the most serious evil in international relations (Steans, 2009). If a country is governed through democratic values, then it will be able to extend in the same when dealing with other nations. Democratic countries are also possible to agree on such issues as environment, world trade and other international issues. A liberal world is more than any other theory promotes respect for democracy in institutions and that promises the most peaceful international relations. Institutional Liberalism Liberalists strongly support for the establishment of international institutions because they make collaboration easier and likely (Weber, 2004). An example includes the European Union which although founded on simple values has highly developed to become a monetary union using the same currency amid member states (Kelstrup, 2000). Other institutions such ASEAN have been in the front line to simplify the six party talks to end the present stand off between the United States and the Republic of North Korea nuclear disarmament efforts. Institutions help encourage international cooperation and reduce the lack of trust and fear. This is facilitated by suitable and clear information about each other behavior and expectations. Liberalism helps to solve the most modern day issues in the international system. Liberalism, war, peace and security Wars were destroying effects to the nation, its people and the international community. Since the World War I and war II, it has been within the interest of nations to practice a world that is free from war peaceful and secure. The liberal consideration advocates that all states work together or at least reaches to a consensus to these fundamental issues (Barkawi Laffey, 2001). By advocating that states move towards establishing democratic values in their governance, democratic peace is achievable. Moreover, institutionalization, existence of economic ties and freedom between states helps decrease chances of war by promoting conversation, engagement and peaceful conflict resolution (Koldziej, 2005). Liberalism and the environment The effects of environmental pollution know on boundaries. Such as the issues a droughts, global warming, increasing of sea level as well as the hurricanes are very costly effects brought by environmental degradation. Liberalists there believe that, it is the moral duty of states to cooperate and stop or mitigate these damaging effects. There are two basic principles of liberalism that requires us to protect and guard the environment. These are the right to have each individual basic needs met and the fact of sensible pluralism. Under the first principle, the environment does not only help in providing our basic needs but also verify us of survival. Liberalism is concerned about the current and the future generation ability to meet the basic requirements and therefore calls for promise to environmental sustainability (Dobson Saiz, 2006) On the other hand, no rational individual will resist that survival depends on the physical environment and that it is good. In addition, no rationa l individual would argument the costly effects of years of environment ignore being experienced in the world today. It is therefore within the liberalist reasonable pluralism that calls for a shared responsibility and action towards environmental protection. Liberalism and international trade Liberalism advocates for the establishment of international institution and a move towards free trade. It calls for the abolishment of limitations and barriers to world trade. Protectionism, inequitable of trade and economic practices are critical issues at the heart of international relations. This is more with respect to the foreign relations between two world economic powers China and the United States. Through calling on increased combination, free trade, and peaceful conflict resolution, liberalism can help resolve most contradictory issues in international relations in the world today. Market liberalism offers the promise of a free, wealthy and pluralistic society for all people (Boaz, 2008). Liberalism and welfare Major issues of welfare comprise of health, hunger, poverty and human rights. Liberalism advocates that the state respects individual liberty. Democratic peace cannot be achieved if these welfare issues are not addressed. Moreover, no single state works in isolation due to the complex interdependence between nations. Liberal democracies consequently should intervene and cooperate in welfare issues (Sutch, 2001). Conclusion In conclusion, liberalism as theory guiding international relations is best placed to handle most modern issues affecting a states relationship with the international community. As have been already outlined, liberalism is the best placed theory in international relations that promises a secure and peaceful world, sustainable environment, trade without restrictions and other barriers, and respects human rights. For it however to work smoothly and yield better results, all countries must accept and be ready to adopt it. This is as evidenced by the fact that best relations and democratic peace only thrives between two democracies. So long as there continues to be non-democratic countries, applicability of liberalism faces many challenges especially with the consequences of globalization. There therefore might be need to alter some principles of liberalism in order to accommodate and guide relations with non-democracies.